Talk:Meteora (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconAlbums C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconLinkin Park C‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linkin Park, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Orphaned references in Meteora (album)[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Meteora (album)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Ask-Bio":

  • From Linkin Park: AskMen.com, Linkin Park – Biography Retrieved March 20, 2007
  • From List of awards and nominations received by Linkin Park: "Linkin Park – Biography". Ask Men. Retrieved 2008-07-17.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 22:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Nobody's Listening" source[edit]

Is said to be ?[edit]

What's up with this wording under his picture "Mike Shinoda (pictured) is said to be included in the writing of all the songs." Specifically, "is said to be" just sounds strange - like a bad rumor or something. Writing credits should be a cut and dried topic since they involve money (royalties). If he's not credited as a writer then he's not a writer, and this sentence should be reworded to remove the possibility that he was a writer or make it more clear that he was in fact a writer. Is there a reference for this nugget of brilliance? Cheers! FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 20:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]